Internet home of Philippine news
Back to homepage
| Bacolod | Baguio | Cagayan de Oro | Cebu | Davao | Dumaguete | General Santos | Iloilo | Manila | Pampanga | Pangasinan | Zamboanga |
 
online flower gift shop to Philippines
 
 
 

Google
Web
www.sunstar.com.ph

  Local News
Court junks Cepalco case vs. gov't
Gabriela takes up the fight vs dad

TigerDirect




Sunday, March 02, 2008
Court junks Cepalco case vs. gov't

A REGIONAL court dismissed the civil case filed by the Cagayan Electric Power and Light Company, Inc. (Cepalco) against the Cagayan de Oro City Government for an ordinance levying taxes on electric poles.

Lawyer Jose Edgardo Uy, Cepalco vice president, said they already appealed the court's decision Thursday.

Post here your Valentine's Day greetings

The case stemmed from a 2005 ordinance imposing a mayor's permit fee of P500 per electric post annually, which Cepalco wants the court to declare null and void for being "illegal."

In a decision issued last Wednesday, Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 17 Judge Florencia D. Sealana-Abbu ruled that the issue of whether or not the tax is excessive, oppressive or confiscatory is a factual issue that is best addressed to the sound discretion of the government agency concerned.

The court held that it behooves upon the agency concerned under the principle of primary jurisdiction to determine the factual issue. In the case at hand, it is the local government unit (LGU) that can determine through public hearing and can make corrective measures such as amending the ordinance.

City Ordinance No. 9527-2005 imposes fees on "electric and/or telecommunication poles/post owned by public utility companies erected on government and/or private lots, along government streets, roads, highways and/or alleys."

Cepalco, in its petition, said the ordinance is "unlawful and illegal for being violative of the fundamental principle that fees, charges and other impositions shall not be unjust, excessive, oppressive or confiscatory."

With over 17,000 poles within the city, the electric utility firm said the imposition can readily translate to an annual payment of P8,500,000, which the company describes as "unconscionable to any standard and therefore confiscatory in nature."

However, the court upheld the power of the LGUs to create their own sources of revenue being Constitutional and therefore, it cannot interfere in the decision making of the LGU concerned by dictating upon them to have the ordinance amended, modified or annulled as the case maybe. (DVAIII/With Press release)

For more Philippine news, visit Sun.Star Cagayan de Oro.

(March 1, 2008 issue)
Write letter to the editor. Click here.
Join the Sun.Star message board. Click here.




ENETWORK HEADLINE
Statements in Makati rally 'analyzed' for sedition
ENETWORK NEWS
3 killed, 7 hurt in Catigan clash
Another Al Khobar man falls
Fires devoured P116M in 2007


[return to top] [home] [network page]


Sun.Star Network Online

LOCAL NEWS
BUSINESS
OPINION
SPORTS
LIFESTYLE
FEATURE

SUPERBALITA

RSS Feed RSS Feed


Classified Power Ads

Past Issues

Western Union

I © Copyright 2007 Sun.Star Publishing, Inc. I Contact the website at sunnexatsunstardotcomdotph I